Jordan Peterson was a psychology professor in Canada. He earned $165,000 a year. Then he made a YouTube video opposing a Canadian law about gender pronouns. The video went viral. Within two years he sold 10 million books. He built a media empire worth $120 million. In November 2022 he flew to Australia. He walked into Parliament House in Canberra. A former Prime Minister met him for a private meeting. He told Coalition MPs how to beat the left. No Australian institution has examined how this happened. His advisory board includes two former Australian Prime Ministers. All his Australian political allies are Coalition. None are Labor. Australian MPs took funded trips to his conferences in London. Nobody asked whether this counts as foreign influence. The silence is the story.
On 24 November 2022, a Canadian psychology professor walked into Australia’s Parliament House. Not as a tourist. Not as a diplomat. As an invited guest of a sitting senator. Scott Morrison, still a member of parliament after losing the prime ministership five months earlier, attended the event and held a private meeting. Senator Matt Canavan hosted, calling it a “huge privilege.” The professor’s name was Jordan Peterson. His advice to the assembled Coalition MPs, as reported by the Australian Financial Review and Crikey, was on how to “beat the left.”
Australians have faced questions about foreign political influence before.
In 1954, Vladimir Petrov, a Soviet intelligence officer, defected in Sydney. The subsequent Royal Commission exposed a network of Soviet agents operating inside Australian institutions and triggered a political crisis that reshaped Australian politics for a generation. The Petrov Affair established a principle: when foreign actors seek to influence Australian political life, the response is scrutiny, not silence.
What happened in Parliament House in November 2022 has received no scrutiny at all.
The professor from Fairview
Jordan Bernt Peterson was born on 12 June 1962 in Edmonton, Alberta, and raised in Fairview, a small town in northern Alberta where his father was a schoolteacher. He earned two undergraduate degrees from the University of Alberta, a PhD in clinical psychology from McGill University in 1991, and then did something unusual for a clinical psychologist: he joined the faculty at Harvard.
At Harvard from 1993 to 1998, he established himself as a serious researcher. His Google Scholar profile shows an h-index of 64 (a measure of scholarly impact where higher is better), over 25,000 citations, and 95 published papers. He returned to Canada in 1998, taking a full professorship at the University of Toronto. His 1999 book Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief argued that myths are culturally universal structures that ground moral and political judgment. It sold modestly. His academic career was respectable, unremarkable, and largely unknown outside psychology departments.
That changed on 27 September 2016.
Peterson uploaded a YouTube video opposing Bill C-16, a Canadian law that added “gender identity or expression” to the Canadian Human Rights Act. Peterson claimed the bill would criminalise the refusal to use preferred pronouns. He said he would not comply.
The legal experts disagreed. The Canadian Bar Association and multiple law professors stated the bill would not compel speech. It added gender identity to existing hate crime provisions. Peterson’s reading of the law was contested. But his opposition tapped into something deeper than statutory interpretation: a cultural anxiety about compelled speech, institutional overreach, and the pace of social change.
Within weeks, student protests erupted at the University of Toronto. Hundreds of faculty signed an open letter calling for his termination. The university declined. The video went viral. Jordan Peterson went from obscure professor to global culture warrior in a matter of weeks.
The book that changed everything
In January 2018, Peterson published 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos. It sold more than 10 million copies. A Channel 4 interview with Cathy Newman went viral. Peterson’s arena tours filled convention centres across the English-speaking world, including Australia.
The book’s appeal was not mysterious. “Clean your room.” “Stand up straight.” “Set your house in order before you criticise the world.” The advice was simple, actionable, and morally unimpeachable. For young men in particular, many of whom felt directionless in an economy that no longer rewarded the things their fathers had been told to value, Peterson offered a framework. Take responsibility. Find meaning in suffering. Build competence before demanding respect.
Thousands of people have described Peterson as saving their lives. On Reddit, the testimonials follow a consistent pattern: felt lost or depressed, encountered Peterson, started with small changes, experienced cascading positive change. The Self-Authoring program he developed with colleagues has a peer-reviewed study from 2010 showing academic performance improvement, though a 2017 replication at Mohawk College found mixed results. Whether the mechanism is uniquely Peterson’s or effective self-help delivered with charisma is debatable. What is not debatable is the scale of the response.
The other half
The criticisms are as specific as the testimonies.
Paul Thagard, a philosopher at the University of Waterloo, published a detailed takedown in Psychology Today in March 2018, arguing that Maps of Meaning is “defective as a work of anthropology, psychology, philosophy, and politics.” Peterson’s evidence for universal myths, Thagard noted, draws exclusively from the Mesopotamian-Judaism-Christianity tradition. Counterexamples abound: the Piraha people have no creation myths. The Iroquois have no Father/Mother/Son motif. Chinese mythology has no heroic son archetype.
Kate Manne, a philosopher at Cornell, identified what she calls the naturalistic fallacy at the heart of Peterson’s argument. Peterson points to serotonin-based dominance hierarchies in lobsters as evidence that human hierarchies are 350 million years old and therefore natural and inevitable. Biologists have noted that the same logic could “prove” that female-dominated hyena hierarchies or bonobo egalitarianism are “natural.” The lobster comparison tells us serotonin is old. It tells us nothing about whether human social structures are just.
Jonathan Waller, a Jungian scholar, published a four-part series in 2021 arguing that Peterson misreads Carl Jung at the most basic level. Peterson treats archetypes as causally deterministic biological patterns. Jung explicitly distinguished synchronistic connections from causal ones. “Peterson rather borrows partial fragments from Jung,” Waller wrote, “in order to justify the moral, ontological and metaphysical claims that he himself wishes to make for his own reasons.”
GLAAD maintains a dedicated profile page cataloguing Peterson’s statements about transgender people. The Human Rights Campaign called him a “radical anti-LGBTQ activist.” The former chair of Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission publicly called him “a racist.” The BC Assembly of First Nations issued an official statement criticising an interview Peterson did with a Conservative leader as “taking aim at Indigenous rights and reconciliation.”
In 2022, the College of Psychologists of Ontario ordered Peterson to undergo professional coaching after complaints about his social media posts. He fought the order through the courts. The Ontario Divisional Court upheld it in August 2023. The Supreme Court of Canada denied his appeal in August 2024. Peterson called it “re-education.” He agreed to the coaching.
The empire
Peterson’s University of Toronto salary in 2017 was $164,706 CAD.
His Patreon alone earned $80,000 per month at its peak, as reported by multiple outlets, nearly six times his professorial salary. His book royalties from three titles have been estimated at $30 million or more. His speaking fees ranged from $35,000 to $50,000 per event, according to industry reporting. An analysis by AuresNotes estimated $44.6 million in total revenue from 229 live events. In June 2022, he signed a multi-year deal with Ben Shapiro’s DailyWire. His YouTube channel has 23 million subscribers. He resigned his tenure in January 2022. He did not need it anymore.
Forbes and multiple financial analysts have estimated his net worth at $120 million or more.
In October 2025, he launched Peterson Academy, offering 63 university-level courses. His daughter Mikhaila, who built and managed the family’s media empire, is co-founder and CEO. His wife Tammy, who survived a terminal cancer diagnosis and converted to Catholicism, hosts her own podcast. The Peterson family operates as a media network, each member reinforcing the others’ narratives.
The crisis
The empire was nearly derailed by a crisis that began in the most ordinary way: a prescription.
Peterson was prescribed benzodiazepines for a severe autoimmune reaction to food. In 2019, his wife Tammy was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive kidney cancer. His benzodiazepine use escalated. He developed akathisia, a movement disorder characterised by unbearable inner restlessness, during withdrawal attempts. North American hospitals, his daughter said, failed to help.
In February 2020, Peterson sought emergency treatment in Moscow. He was placed in a medically induced coma for approximately eight days in a Russian reanimatology ward. He woke confused, tethered to a bed, surrounded by people speaking a foreign language. Drug experts at the British Columbia Centre on Substance Use publicly questioned the treatment methodology. Peterson himself later described being suicidal during the worst of the withdrawal.
The health crisis did not end the empire. It deepened the mythology. Suffering, overcome through discipline and familial loyalty, is the Peterson brand’s central narrative. The crisis became proof of concept.
As reported by 9News Australia and Newsweek in April 2026, Mikhaila Peterson has revealed that her father continues to suffer from severe akathisia, a psych-med-induced neurological injury persisting for more than six years. She described it as “the worst thing she has ever seen someone endure.” In December 2025, he was hospitalised with seizures and placed in another medical coma. He is 63 years old.
The Australian pipeline
Here is where the story shifts from cultural phenomenon to Australian political question.
In February and March 2019, Peterson toured Australia on the back of 12 Rules for Life. He played the Brisbane Convention Centre, twice. Sydney. Canberra. Adelaide Entertainment Centre. Arena-scale ticketed events promoted by TEG Dainty.
In November 2022, he returned. This time, he did not just play arenas. He walked into Parliament House.
The event on 24 November 2022 was invitation-only. Senator Matt Canavan hosted. Scott Morrison, five months out of the prime ministership, attended and held a private meeting with Peterson in a Parliament House office. Peterson’s advice to the assembled Coalition MPs was on how to “beat the left.”
No Australian parliamentary committee has examined the event. The Department of Parliamentary Services has not been asked to explain what security and protocol clearances were applied. No one has asked whether a foreign media figure with no elected mandate, no diplomatic standing, and no Australian security clearance should be given privileged access to sitting federal parliamentarians inside the building that houses the nation’s legislature.
Then the pipeline deepened.
In June 2023, the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship, or ARC, was announced. It describes itself as a global movement for moral and cultural renewal. Its advisory board includes two former Australian prime ministers: John Howard and Tony Abbott. Also on the board: Andrew Hastie, the Shadow Minister for Defence. Jacinta Price, the Coalition senator. Amanda Stoker, the former LNP senator. John Anderson, the former deputy prime minister.
Every Australian political figure on ARC’s advisory board is Coalition. Not one is Labor. Not one is Green. Not one is independent.
In November 2023, ARC held its inaugural conference in London. Barnaby Joyce and other Coalition MPs attended on fully funded trips. The Guardian documented the flights. Crikey compiled the full list of attendees.
In February 2025, ARC held another conference in London. Senator Bridget McKenzie attended. Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming planned to skip a week of state parliament to attend but cancelled under public pressure.
In October 2024, ARC scheduled a conference in Sydney. Peterson himself was a no-show. As reported by the Sydney Morning Herald, he had failed to apply for an Australian visa in time, compounded by a family emergency. The architect of the Australian pipeline could not enter the country for his own conference.
The pattern
Australians have faced questions about foreign political influence before. The Petrov Affair in 1954 established that when foreign actors seek to influence Australian political life, the response is scrutiny. The Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Act of 2018, which requires people acting on behalf of foreign governments to register their activities in Australia, was designed for a different era. The Australian Electoral Commission monitors foreign political donations.
What the documents describe is a gap in the system. Peterson is not a foreign government. He is not a registered foreign agent. He is a media figure with a massive audience, a $120 million empire, and a clear political orientation. His organisation has placed former prime ministers on its board, funded travel for sitting MPs, and secured invitation-only access to Parliament House. None of this triggers existing disclosure requirements because none of it fits the categories the law anticipated.
The silence is not evidence of wrongdoing by any individual. It is evidence of a system that has not caught up to the way political influence works in 2026.
The accountability gap
No Australian parliamentary committee has examined the relationship between Peterson’s organisation and sitting federal politicians.
No disclosure requirements were triggered when Coalition MPs attended ARC events on funded trips, beyond the standard register of interests entries (which require MPs to declare gifts and funded travel).
No Australian regulatory body has assessed whether Peterson’s media presence, broadcast on Sky News Australia and distributed through News Corp platforms, constitutes a form of foreign political influence that warrants examination.
No one has asked whether an organisation whose Australian advisory board is exclusively Coalition, which funds travel for Coalition MPs, and whose founder addressed Coalition parliamentarians inside Parliament House on how to “beat the left,” meets any definition of partisan foreign political activity.
The register of interests for Barnaby Joyce, Bridget McKenzie, and other ARC-attending MPs should document the funded travel. Whether it does, in full and on time, is a question a journalist could answer with a single phone call to the Department of Finance.
The visa records from October 2024, when Peterson failed to enter Australia for his own conference, sit in the Department of Home Affairs. Whether he applied and was refused, or simply failed to apply, is a question a freedom of information request could answer.
The Parliament House event approval from November 2022 sits in the Department of Parliamentary Services. Who approved it, what protocols were applied, and whether any security assessment was conducted are questions that would take a committee five minutes to ask.
Nobody has asked them.
The two halves
There are people who will tell you that Jordan Peterson saved their life. They are not lying. They cleaned their rooms. They set goals. They found meaning in suffering. For some of them, the cascade of small changes Peterson advocates genuinely transformed their circumstances.
There are people who will tell you that Jordan Peterson is a dangerous fraud. They are not lying either. His lobster argument is a naturalistic fallacy. His reading of Jung is contested by actual Jungian scholars. His interpretation of Bill C-16 was disputed by the lawyers who wrote it. His claims about enforced monogamy, made in the wake of a mass murder by an incel, were widely criticised as holding women’s behaviour responsible for male violence.
Both things are true. The self-help works for some people. The ideology is flawed in specific, documented ways. The two halves of the Peterson phenomenon are not contradictory. They are the same phenomenon. Peterson embeds culturally resonant, genuinely useful personal advice alongside contested ideological claims. Critics and supporters argue past each other because they are responding to different layers of the same output.
The question for Australians is not whether Jordan Peterson is right or wrong. The question is whether a foreign media figure with a $120 million empire, a 23-million-subscriber YouTube channel, and a clear political orientation should have walked into Parliament House and addressed sitting parliamentarians on party strategy without a single institutional eyebrow being raised.
That question has not been asked. The silence is the story.
Sources:
The Varsity (University of Toronto), 21 Nov 2016 and 29 Nov 2017; Toronto Life, 25 Jan 2017; CBC Docs POV, Bill C-16 explainer; Vox, 26 Mar 2018 and 6 Jun 2018; The Guardian, 7 Feb 2018 and multiple 2023-2025 pieces; Psychology Today, 12 Mar 2018; The Conversation, 24 Jan 2018; National Post, 2 Mar 2021; ABC Australia, 9 Feb 2020; Forbes, 29 Jun 2022; AFR, 24 Nov 2022; Crikey, 25 Nov 2022 and 23 Nov 2023; SBS, 25 Nov 2022; DeSmog, 5 Sep 2023; Data and Society Research Institute, 17 Sep 2018; Media Matters, 14 Mar 2025; Penguin Random House author page; Google Scholar profile; McGill eScholarship repository; Jonathan Waller Medium series, 28 May 2021; GLAAD profile; Human Rights Campaign, 2 Aug 2018; BC Assembly of First Nations statement, 5 Sep 2024; 9News Australia, 20 Apr 2026; Newsweek, 20 Apr 2026; SMH, 23 Oct 2024; SMH, 23 May 2018 (enforced monogamy); HEQCO report, Mar 2017; PubMed PMID: 20230067; Ontario Divisional Court, 2023 ONSC 4685; SCC case 41168.
No conflicts of interest declared.
Related Investigations
Political Capture / Media Narrative Accountability
The Donation Pipeline
Fossil fuel companies donated $3.98 million to Australia's two major political parties in a single financial year. The Coalition got $2.92 million. Labor got $1.06 million. Both got enough to notice.
Julian Assange: The Publisher the CIA Discussed Assassinating
He published what the US government wanted kept secret. The CIA discussed killing him. He spent 14 years confined. Then he walked free.
ANZAC Day: Welcome to Country Booed in Four Cities
Welcome to Country ceremonies were booed at dawn services in Melbourne, Sydney, Perth and Adelaide on ANZAC Day 2026. It is the second consecutive year disruptions have occurred, spreading from three cities to four.